In fact, the bottom of metaphor and analogy of shoes, and no significant difference, the problem is to use them more than anything else. We must understand that the application of this analogy is limited in scope, not infinite; it is not such an analogy is to remove all standards. I have argued that in an article: "The question is, what we face is not bizarre shoes, but the ancient and modern literature with the widest universal? Big shoes -. Literature is http://www.onlinesuprashoessale.com/ we has a poetry as poetry, drama should be dramatic, people should have human nature, should the party have the same spirit, if not even this can have shoes that will not go relativism and nihilism? Says what it means.
We know that things are its universality and particularity. If children's literature, whether you are a classical or popular, even if it is "commercial", as long as you think you are also children's literature to children's literature must contain a certain character, which is common, it is universal. Did this common for children's literature is no longer a. At the same time, there will be special, and each country has its own children's literature is unique, each will have his work is the individual character. If we use the metaphor of shoes or beds, to criticize some people do not recognize the special nature of the different types of works or supra skytop shoes Works of different writers that this analogy can be said Majored. But if you want to use this metaphor to deny the different types, different authors and different works, also has some universal, such as literature should have some, so it can not help but absurd. Metaphor itself is still very much alive, but with the wrong people, he does not see the metaphor behind the subject is changed. - This is the parable of the concrete abstract form of analysis, and its advantage is that we do not like to be the "same" confused. Add a little overreaching, which is a preliminary philosophical analysis.
Below we will get back to where the concrete from the abstract. How can we use the literature of a standard to be described as "a shoe" it? Literature is literature, it has always been united. Can not say that China has its own literature, literature of foreign countries, Wang Ming Wang Ming literary, "the story" with "story" of literature, they are not interoperable (i.e. not comparable), can only say, in different regions , various authors, different jobs, the literary manifestations to be different, the content will compete with literature. This is very hot as we many people love supra vaider say that Africa, the Arctic cold, but the theory of hot and cold but should be uniform scale, 0 degrees is 0 degrees, 40 degrees is 40 degrees, the temperature can not be standard in Africa, the Arctic North Pole. Another example is the tomato, we say sweet, that watermelon is not sweet, is the everyday language, but if people have to say is the most sweet tomato food, we both have to make a comparison of sugar, one than down, watermelon significantly higher than tomatoes. Do not allow comparisons, we must hold on to each have their own standards, people confused.
Children's literature in the content of the public is lower than the classics, but we must recognize this fact (it may be clear by comparing the facts), rather than chicanery that both the literary content as high as, or even that it is also fairly be higher (in fact some people say that.) But at the same time, we will find it in other areas may exceed the classical works, such as in the bookstore for a short period the number of orders, which suffered in the primary school in popularity, and supra tk on. But these "other side" is not a substitute for literature. We can not be too bad or inadequate say, we can not separate weights and measures, or we really went to the relativism and nihilism.
I do not know it was not clear. But I'm actually having philosophical thinking, which is very important. When we are faced with few or alive or profound theories, such as testing only do not use common sense, but also the philosophy of poor discrimination, it is really dangerous. Many former winding road, not that it came from?
Although philosophical thinking and it has long been described as literary, by many to be dc shoes are on hot sae now as garbage, but I advise you to take the world with the fellow really on the road, maybe we will still only the old shoes.
Accueil